|
Hoov's
Musings (volume 3, number 4) |
|
noti@nplusi
Mark Hoover,
President, Acuitive, Inc.
I’ve recently
had a lot of people inquire whether I was going to be at the
upcoming N+I in Las Vegas. Others just assumed I would be, and based
on that premise proposed some meetings or other events.
But I am not going
to be there. There are several reasons for that:
- My wife won’t let me
- I hate Las Vegas
- I waited too long to make
reservations
- No client is paying me to go
Any one of these
is probably a compelling enough reason to miss the show.
But in combination, it’s a no-brainer.
However, had these
situations not existed, I still probably would have resisted going
to the show. Why not
go? Well, I think the
question is ‘Why go?’
Back in the “old
days” I was a faithful attendee and participant at Interop.
But that was when vendors were displaying crimping tools for
connecting transceivers to Ethernet cables, when long haired,
freaky-looking people were “flocking” together in rooms to work
out interoperability issues with TCP/IP implementations (what could
be more fun than a room full of Hooman Behestis?), and when
engineers and product managers from the vendors, often scruffy
looking from having spent the entire night getting the demo running
or getting the product working at the Interoperability booth, did
booth duty to explain what they do and why.
Although the show
was much smaller than it is today, with far fewer vendors, it took a
lot longer to experience all that was there to be learned.
Each booth visit, each conversation with each vendor, each
side meeting, and each presentation was full of detailed technical
information, interesting abstractions, competitor bashing, and
predictions, all of which needed time to be understood and fully
absorbed. And then
there was the anticipation of the Cisco party, to see how they had
managed to top last year’s. For a variety of reasons, one
couldn’t really adequately cover an Interop back then.
Nowadays, the
event is much bigger, physically.
Too big for the San Jose Convention Center and for the
Moscone Center combined. So
it has migrated to Las Vegas, at least for one instantiation per
year.
Nothing is too big
for Las Vegas. No bet,
no ego, no casino/monument, no enhanced breast, and certainly no
trade show can outsize Las Vegas.
If there is not enough room, Las Vegas can just sprawl a
little more into the desert to accommodate things.
So there you have
it. N+I bigger and
badder than ever. Yet
you go there and walk the floor (or should I say floors) and after
about half a day you say- “OK, I’m done.
What’s next?”
Why is this?
I attribute it to
the invasion of people who wear ties and nice dresses.
The entire thing has become a marketing event, rather than an
industry development event. Marketing
communications managers and temporary workers staff booths.
You can’t get an answer to any question of any depth about
the vendor or their products, but you can get your card swiped and
take away a shopping bag or a bouncy ball or a coffee mug. The whole
thing has become a battle to see who looks biggest, glossiest,
prettiest, and loudest. As
each vendor endeavors to cut through the noise, the level of
marketing volume and hype incrementally increases, requiring the
other vendors to increase their decibels, and the cycle continues.
The result is no information at all.
Thirty to forty vendors claim to be “industry firsts” in
VoIP, or VPNs, or Edge Routing, or MPLS, or (historically) SNMP,
Frame Relay, ATM, etc.
In lieu of
substance, consumer-marketing techniques have come to flourish.
But where are the consumers?
My observation the last time that I went was that the sparse
crowds at most of the booths were marketing people from other
vendors. (The easiest
people to market to are other marketing people.
They’ll fall for anything. They just can’t allow
themselves to get cynical about marketing as practiced today).
When an industry event becomes a big internal group hug, with
vendors marketing to one another, you know it’s in trouble.
The other
constituency represented well in my informal poll was financial
analysts and consultants. So
where are all the end customers?
Well, I believe that the smart ones either (a) aren’t at
the event at all, or (b) are engaged in some form of Las Vegas
debauchery.
This leads to
another situation that is fun to observe – the marketing of the
N+I show itself by the N+I people to the vendors who fund the show.
Many vendors have expressed to me that they are looking to
cut down on the number of trade shows they support and the
investment they make in each trade show.
That’s a big threat to N+I.
As the quality of the attendance (if not the quantity) has
diminished, the N+I people need to search for other compelling
reasons to attract vendors.
Las Vegas
debauchery aside, there does remain three good reasons for end users
to attend N+I:
1)
to attend the seminars and tutorials, which are generally
pretty good
2)
to visit Start-up city, which in some ways is a throw back to
Interop’s past
3)
to check out the temporary workers staffing the booths
For the vendors,
you can add two reasons to that list:
4)
to meet with other industry people who are required to go to
the show, such as industry analysts, press, and executives from
other companies
5)
to announce a new product.
On that last
point, N+I has traditionally been a good venue to announce new
products. You can
meet with a lot of the press and analyst community that you normally
would have to go on a road show to meet, and you can leverage the
advertising and marketing communications that surround the N+I show
itself.
It used to be that
a large percentage of new product announcements were done at or just
before a large trade show such as N+I.
That percentage is diminishing, however.
These days, one has to think twice about whether that is the
best approach. The show is so big, you can get lost in the noise of
all the vendors doing such announcements in such a compact period of
time. If you are in a
choir of 100 people, is your voice really heard?
(In my case, the answer is yes, but that’s an issue related
to my voice and not to good marketing practice).
However, if you do
announce close to or at N+I, you can almost be guaranteed of some
form of “Best of Show” award.
Most people don’t know that to be eligible for these
awards, you have to announce your product in a tight time window
around N+I. This is
their attempt to keep N+I news worthy and viable.
The N+I people are
smart. They hand out
roughly a zillion “Best of Show” awards in a large variety of
categories. The names
of the awards are suitably abstracted so that they are more
compelling when you see them later on the vendors web site, with
shortened titles such as “Best New Product”.
But the official title of the award was really “Best New
Hardware Appliance Performing Bandwidth Management in a Taupe
Colored Box Announced On Tuesday Morning By A Company Representative
With A Southern Accent.”
But
if that title were required to be used by the vendor, there would be
one less reason for them to attend the show at all, and everyone
would be at the Next Generation Networks Conferences with people
like me.
(volume 3, number
4)

Send email to
info@acuitive.com with questions or comments about this web
site.
Copyright ©1997-2001 Acuitive, Inc. All Rights Reserved
|